No Place for Urban Art

Authors

  • Christos Voutichtis Hochschule für Gestaltung Offenbach am Main, Schlossstraße 31, 63065 Offenbach/M
  • Jonas Aaron Rehm Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Theodor-W.-Adorno-Platz 1, 60323 Frankfurt am Main

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25765/sauc.v2i2.52

Keywords:

Plato, urban art, subject, latency, non-place

Abstract

The following is an attempt to situate Urban Art within the philosophical tradition with and against Plato’s exclusion of the mimetic artist from the well-ordered city-state. It takes into account modern as well as postmodern literature on the concept of art and the city in order to rehabilitate a place for art within the city limits without sacrificing its potential to call into question any clear-cut limit the philosophical tradition has attempted to draw around the concepts of the subject, the work of art and the city itself.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Global Statistics ℹ️

Cumulative totals since publication
31
Views
13
Downloads
44
Total

Published

2016-11-23

How to Cite

Voutichtis, C., & Rehm, J. A. (2016). No Place for Urban Art. Street Art & Urban Creativity, 2(2), 45–47. https://doi.org/10.25765/sauc.v2i2.52