Agentes de IA auditables de lazo cerrado para gemelos digitales de puentes urbanos
Validación sintética seguida de una implementación a escala municipal en Utsunomiya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62161/sauc.v12.6387Palabras clave:
IA agéntica, Gemelos digitales urbanos, Ciudades inteligentes, Mantenimiento de puentes, Resiliencia urbana, Planificación multiobjetivo, IA auditableResumen
El mantenimiento de los puentes urbanos es un problema de gobernanza de la ciudad inteligente que implica evidencia incierta, presupuestos restringidos y acciones críticas para la seguridad. Presentamos una arquitectura de inteligencia artificial auditable de lazo cerrado que separa las observaciones, los estados inferidos, las alternativas, las decisiones y las intervenciones. Los mecanismos se validan en SynthTown, un municipio de verdad de referencia con 50 puentes y 842 componentes, mediante la predicción de estados ocultos, la planificación multiobjetivo, el cribado por parte de los actores interesados, la recalibración por retroalimentación y salvaguardas de verificación-reparación. Una implementación con datos públicos abarca 1733 puentes de Utsunomiya e integra 1592 puntos de radar de apertura sintética interferométrico de dispersores persistentes, registros de inspección, modelos de mantenimiento tridimensionales y planes conscientes de la capacidad. La verificación eliminó las salidas inseguras en el banco de pruebas sintético
Descargas
Estadísticas globales ℹ️
|
0
Visualizaciones
|
0
Descargas
|
|
0
Total
|
|
Citas
Amershi, S., Weld, D., Vorvoreanu, M., Fourney, A., Nushi, B., Collisson, P., Suh, J., Iqbal, S.,
Bennett, P. N., Inkpen, K., Teevan, J., Kikin-Gil, R., & Horvitz, E. (2019). Guidelines for human-AI interaction. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Article 3, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300233
Andriotis, C. P., & Papakonstantinou, K. G. (2021). Deep reinforcement learning driven inspection and maintenance planning under incomplete information and constraints. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 212, 107551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107551
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 57(1), 289-300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
Bocchini, P., & Frangopol, D. M. (2011). A probabilistic computational framework for bridge network optimal maintenance scheduling. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 96(2), 332-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2010.09.001
Boje, C., Guerriero, A., Kubicki, S., & Rezgui, Y. (2020). Towards a semantic construction digital twin: Directions for future research. Automation in Construction, 114, 103179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103179
Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., & Meyarivan, T. (2002). A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6(2), 182-197. https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.996017
Debenedetti, E., Zhang, J., Balunovic, M., Beurer-Kellner, L., Fischer, M., & Tramer, F. (2024). AgentDojo: A dynamic environment to evaluate prompt injection attacks and defenses for LLM agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.13352. https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.13352
Dembski, F., Wossner, U., Letzgus, M., Ruddat, M., & Yamu, C. (2020). Urban digital twins for smart cities and citizens: The case study of Herrenberg, Germany. Sustainability, 12(6), 2307. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062307
Dwork, C., Feldman, V., Hardt, M., Pitassi, T., Reingold, O., & Roth, A. (2015). The reusable holdout: Preserving validity in adaptive data analysis. Science, 349(6248), 636-638. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa9375
Frangopol, D. M., Dong, Y., & Sabatino, S. (2017). Bridge life-cycle performance and cost: Analysis, prediction, optimisation and decision-making. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 13(10), 1239-1257. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2016.1267772
Frangopol, D. M., Kong, J. S., & Gharaibeh, E. S. (2001). Reliability-based life-cycle management of highway bridges. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 15(1), 27-34. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2001)15:1(27)
Frangopol, D. M., & Liu, M. (2007). Maintenance and management of civil infrastructure based on condition, safety, optimization, and life-cycle cost. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 3(1), 29-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732470500253164
Gebru, T., Morgenstern, J., Vecchione, B., Vaughan, J. W., Wallach, H., Daume III, H., & Crawford, K. (2021). Datasheets for datasets. Communications of the ACM, 64(12), 86-92. https://doi.org/10.1145/3458723
Geifman, Y., & El-Yaniv, R. (2017). Selective classification for deep neural networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 4878-4887. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2017/hash/4a8423d5e91fda00bb7e46540e2b0cf1-Abstract.html
Guo, C., Pleiss, G., Sun, Y., & Weinberger, K. Q. (2017). On calibration of modern neural networks. Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, 70, 1321-1330. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v70/guo17a.html
Guo, Z., Cheng, S., Wang, H., Liang, S., Qin, Y., Li, P., Liu, Z., Sun, M., & Liu, Y. (2024). StableToolBench: Towards stable large-scale benchmarking on tool learning of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.07714. https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.07714
Halfawy, M. R., Dridi, L., & Baker, S. (2009). A multi-objective optimization decision support model for renewal planning of sewer networks. Journal of Water Management Modeling, R235-09. https://doi.org/10.14796/JWMM.R235-09
Howard, R. A. (1966). Information value theory. IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics, 2(1), 22-26. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSSC.1966.300074
Ji, Z., Lee, N., Frieske, R., Yu, T., Su, D., Xu, Y., Ishii, E., Bang, Y., Chen, D., Dai, W., Madotto, A., & Fung, P. (2023). Survey of hallucination in natural language generation. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(12), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1145/3571730
Jimenez, C. E., Yang, J., Wettig, A., Yao, S., Pei, K., Press, O., & Narasimhan, K. (2023). SWE-bench: Can language models resolve real-world GitHub issues? arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.06770. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.06770
Kaelbling, L. P., Littman, M. L., & Cassandra, A. R. (1998). Planning and acting in partially observable stochastic domains. Artificial Intelligence, 101(1-2), 99-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-3702(98)00023-X
Kritzinger, W., Karner, M., Traar, G., Henjes, J., & Sihn, W. (2018). Digital twin in manufacturing: A categorical literature review and classification. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 51(11), 1016-1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.474
Lei, X., Xia, Y., Deng, L., & Sun, L. (2022). A deep reinforcement learning framework for life-cycle maintenance planning of regional deteriorating bridges using inspection data. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-022-03210-3
Lewis, P., Perez, E., Piktus, A., Petroni, F., Karpukhin, V., Goyal, N., Kuttler, H., Lewis, M., Yih, W., Rocktaschel, T., Riedel, S., & Kiela, D. (2020). Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 9459-9474. https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.11401
Lin, S., Hilton, J., & Evans, O. (2022). Teaching models to express their uncertainty in words. Transactions on Machine Learning Research. https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.14334
Liu, K., & El-Gohary, N. (2021). Semantic neural network ensemble for automated dependency relation extraction from bridge inspection reports. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 35(4), 04021007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000961
Liu, P., Xiong, R., & Tang, P. (2022). Mining observation and cognitive behavior process patterns of bridge inspectors. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.09257. https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.09257
Liu, X., Yu, H., Zhang, H., Xu, Y., Lei, X., Lai, H., Gu, Y., Ding, H., Men, K., Yang, K., Zhang, S., Deng, X., Zeng, A., Du, Z., Zhang, C., Shen, S., Zhang, T., Su, Y., Sun, H., ... Tang, J. (2024). AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as agents. International Conference on Learning Representations. https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.03688
Lu, J., Holleis, T., Zhang, Y., Aumayer, B., Nan, F., Bai, F., Ma, S., Ma, S., Li, M., Yin, G., Wang, Z., & Pang, R. (2024). ToolSandbox: A stateful, conversational, interactive evaluation benchmark for LLM tool use capabilities. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.04682. https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.04682
Ma, C., Zhang, J., Zhu, Z., Yang, C., Yang, Y., Jin, Y., Lan, Z., Kong, L., & He, J. (2024). AgentBoard: An analytical evaluation board of multi-turn LLM agents. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.13178
Madanat, S., & Ben-Akiva, M. (1994). Optimal inspection and repair policies for infrastructure facilities. Transportation Science, 28(1), 55-62. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.28.1.55
Meerow, S., Newell, J. P., & Stults, M. (2016). Defining urban resilience: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 147, 38-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
Mialon, G., Fourrier, C., Swift, C., Wolf, T., LeCun, Y., & Scialom, T. (2023). GAIA: A benchmark for general AI assistants. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.12983. https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.12983
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, Japan. (2024). White paper on infrastructure management 2024. https://www.mlit.go.jp/statistics/content/001855598.pdf
Morcous, G. (2006). Performance prediction of bridge deck systems using Markov chains. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 20(2), 146-155. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2006)20:2(146)
Moreau, L., & Missier, P. (Eds.). (2013). PROV-DM: The PROV data model. W3C Recommendation. https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-dm/
NASA Earth Science and Technology Office. (n.d.). Technology readiness levels. https://esto.nasa.gov/trl/
Orcesi, A. D., & Frangopol, D. M. (2010). Optimization of bridge management under budget constraints: Role of structural health monitoring. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2202(1), 148-155. https://doi.org/10.3141/2202-18
Page, E. S. (1954). Continuous inspection schemes. Biometrika, 41(1-2), 100-115. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/41.1-2.100
Papakonstantinou, K. G., & Shinozuka, M. (2014a). Planning structural inspection and maintenance policies via dynamic programming and Markov processes. Part I: Theory. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 130, 202-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2014.04.005
Papakonstantinou, K. G., & Shinozuka, M. (2014b). Planning structural inspection and maintenance policies via dynamic programming and Markov processes. Part II: POMDP implementation. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 130, 214-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2014.04.006
Pastore, T., Mariniello, G., & Asprone, D. (2024). A simheuristic approach to scheduling sustainable and reliable maintenance for bridge infrastructure. Mathematics, 12(21), 3420. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12213420
Pereira, G. V., Parycek, P., Falco, E., & Kleinhans, R. (2018). Smart governance in the context of smart cities: A literature review. Information Polity, 23(2), 143-162. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-170067
Robelin, C.-A., & Madanat, S. M. (2007). History-dependent bridge deck maintenance and replacement optimization with Markov decision processes. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 13(3), 195-201. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2007)13:3(195)
Ruan, Y., Dong, H., Wang, A., Pitis, S., Zhou, Y., Ba, J., Dubois, Y., Maddison, C. J., & Hashimoto, T. (2024). Identifying the risks of LM agents with an LM-emulated sandbox. International Conference on Learning Representations. https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.15817
Shinn, N., Cassano, F., Berman, E., Gopinath, A., Narasimhan, K., & Yao, S. (2023). Reflexion: Language agents with verbal reinforcement learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36. https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.11366
Su, S., Zhong, R. Y., Jiang, Y., Song, J., Fu, Y., & Cao, H. (2023). Digital twin and its potential applications in construction industry: State-of-art review and a conceptual framework. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 58, 102030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2023.102030
Thompson, P. D., Small, E. P., Johnson, M., & Marshall, A. R. (1998). The Pontis bridge management system. Structural Engineering International, 8(4), 303-308. https://doi.org/10.2749/101686698780488758
Torres-Machi, C., Yepes, V., & Pellicer, E. (2020). Markov-based deterioration modelling for long-term bridge management: A critical review and research needs. Engineering Structures, 206, 110096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110096
Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C., & Geyer, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence and the public sector-Applications and challenges. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(7), 596-615. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1498103
Wu, C., Wu, P., Wang, J., Jiang, R., Chen, M., & Wang, X. (2021). Critical review of data-driven decision-making in bridge operation and maintenance. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 18(1), 47-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2020.1833946
Yao, S., Shinn, N., Razavi, P., & Narasimhan, K. (2024). Tau-bench: A benchmark for tool-agent-user interaction in real-world domains. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.12045. https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.12045
Yao, S., Zhao, J., Yu, D., Du, N., Shafran, I., Narasimhan, K., & Cao, Y. (2023). ReAct: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models. International Conference on Learning Representations. https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.03629
Zhang, C., Karim, M. M., & Qin, R. (2022). A multitask deep learning model for parsing bridge elements and segmenting defects in bridge inspection images. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.02190. https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.02190
Zhang, C., Lei, X., Xia, Y., & Sun, L. (2024). Automatic bridge inspection database construction through hybrid information extraction and large language models. Developments in the Built Environment, 20, 100549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2023.100549
Zhang, Z., Cui, S., Lu, Y., Zhou, J., Yang, J., Wang, H., & Huang, M. (2024). Agent-SafetyBench: Evaluating the safety of LLM agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.14470. https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.14470
Zhou, S., Xu, F. F., Zhu, H., Zhou, X., Lo, R., Sridhar, A., Cheng, X., Ou, T., Bisk, Y., Fried, D., Alon, U., & Neubig, G. (2023). WebArena: A realistic web environment for building autonomous agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.13854. https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.13854
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Los autores/as conservan los derechos de autor y ceden a la revista el derecho de la primera publicación y el derecho de edición
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Los autores/as que publiquen en esta revista aceptan las siguientes condiciones:
- Los autores/as conservan los derechos de autor.
- Los autores/as ceden a la revista el derecho de la primera publicación. La revista también posee los derechos de edición.
- Todos los contenidos publicados se regulan mediante una Licencia Atribución/Reconocimiento-SinDerivados 4.0 Internacional. Acceda a la versión informativa y texto legal de la licencia. En virtud de ello, se permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado siempre que mencionen la autoría del trabajo y a la primera publicación en esta revista. Si transforma el material, no podrá distribuir el trabajo modificado.
- Los autores/as pueden realizar otros acuerdos contractuales independientes y adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del artículo publicado en esta revista (p. ej., incluirlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro) siempre que indiquen claramente que el trabajo se publicó por primera vez en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as a publicar su trabajo en Internet (por ejemplo en páginas institucionales o personales), una vez publicado en la revista y citando a la misma ya que puede conducir a intercambios productivos y a una mayor y más rápida difusión del trabajo publicado (vea The Effect of Open Access).
