La nueva materialidad como correspondencia

Ejemplos tecnológicos emergentes en los espacios públicos

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62161/sauc.v12.6375

Palabras clave:

Materialidad, Nuevo Materialismo, Espacio Público, Tecnologías Digitales, Corresponder

Resumen

Hoy, la concepción de la materialidad ha evolucionado para abarcar tanto lo material como lo inmaterial, así como lo humano y lo no humano. Partiendo de los fundamentos filosóficos del nuevo materialismo, este estudio interpreta la materialidad como una forma de correspondencia. Esta interpretación se basa en una perspectiva no dualista y no jerárquica, conceptualizando la correspondencia como un diálogo que se abre a un mundo que trasciende lo meramente subjetivo, un modo de comunicación que tiene lugar entre las "cosas". Dentro de este marco, los proyectos D-Tower, Amphibious Architecture, I’m Lost in Paris y Air Bubble, todos realizados en espacios públicos urbanos, se examinan desde la perspectiva de la nueva materialidad como correspondencia. En estas obras públicas, la materialidad se define como un campo relacional de interacción en el que se produce la correspondenciaun espacio en el que las cosas establecen relaciones de escritura y respuesta entre sí.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Estadísticas globales ℹ️

Totales acumulados desde su publicación
0
Visualizaciones
0
Descargas
0
Total
Descargas por formato:
PDF 0 PDF (English) 0

Citas

Arbona, J. (2010). It’s in Your Nature: I’m Lost in Paris. Architectural Design, 80(3), 46-53. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.1074

Ardatürk, A. S. (2022). Anonymous Reflections of Art in Public Spaces; Examples From the World. Street Art and Urban Creativity, 8(2), 17-34. https://doi.org/10.25765/sauc.v8i2.614

Aynalı, N. (2023). Mimarlıkta “maddi olmayan”: Kavramsal bir inceleme. IDA: International Design and Art Journal, 5(2), 221-232.

Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs, 28(3), 801-831. https://doi.org/10.1086/345321

Bengisu, M., & Ferrara, M. (2018). Materials that move: Smart materials, intelligent design. Springer International Publishing.

Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Duke University Press.

Bianco, A., & Scarpitti, C. (2024). Matter’s Life: Speculative Biodesign Practices Toward a New Materialism. In C. Gambardella (E.d.). For Nature/With Nature: New Sustainable Design Scenarios (pp. 357-370). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53122-4

Braidotti, R. (2019). A theoretical framework for the critical posthumanities. Theory, Culture & Society, 36(6), 31-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276418771486

Cantrell, B. E., & Holzman, J. (2015). Responsive landscapes: Strategies for responsive technologies in landscape architecture. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315757735

Chris Woebken Studio. (2009). Amphibious Architecture. Chriswoebken. Retrieved November 01, 2025, form https://chriswoebken.com/Amphibious-Architecture

Colebrook, C. (2017). Materiality: Sex, gender, and what lies beneath. In The Routledge Companion to Feminist Philosophy (pp. 194-206). Routledge.

Coole, D., & Frost, S. (Eds.). (2010). Introducing the new materialisms. In New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics (pp. 1-43.). Duke Univesrsity Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822392996-001

DeLanda, M. (2015). The new materiality. Architectural Design, 85(5), 16-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.1948000000

Derin, O. E., & Baytaş, B. (2025). The architecture of relational materialism: A categorial formation of onto-epistemological premises. Foundations of Science, (30), 1-51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-025-09977-0

EcoLogicStudio. (2021) Air Bubble | air-purifying eco-machine. Retrieved April 30, 2026, form https://ecologicstudio.com/projects/air-bubble-air-purifying-eco-machine

Gentile, J. (2014). On mattering, materiality, and “transitional memory”: A discussion of Jonathan H. Slavin's essay. Psychoanalytic Perspectives, 11(1), 35-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/1551806X.2014.857987

Gruosso, S., Del Signore, M., & Di Cinzio, A. (2025). The extended mind of public space: How urban design shapes human experience. Frontiers in Built Environment, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2025.1504549

Gygi, F. R. (2018). Materiality. The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118924396.wbiea2338

Hafermalz, E., & Riemer, K. (2015). The question of materiality: Mattering in the network society. In Becker, J., vom Brocke, J., & de Marco, M. (Eds.). Association for information systems (pp. 1–17). Munster, Germany: AISeL. https://doi.org/10.18151/7217339

Harper, D. (n.d.). Correspond. In Online Etymology Dictionary. Retrieved April 5, 2026, form https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=CORRESPOND

Harrison, A.L (2012). The parameters of the Posthuman. In 100th ACSA Annual Meeting Proceedings: Digital Aptitudes (pp. 618-624). Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture. https://www.acsa-arch.org/chapter/the-parameters-of-the-posthuman/

Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. The University of Chicago Press.

Hood, E. J., & Kraehe, A. M. (2017). Creative Matter: New Materialism in Art Education Research, Teaching, and Learning. Art Education, 70(2), 32–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2017.1274196

Janson, A. & Tigges, F. (2014). Fundamental concepts of architecture: The vocabulary of spatial situations. Birkhäuser.

Jordan, M., & Rizzioli, G. (2024). Introducing open montage:Material performativity in urban media configurations in space. NECSUS-European Journal of Media Studies, 13(1), 74-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/22832

Karandinou, A. (2017). No Matter: Theories and practices of the ephemeral in Architecture (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/97813155983900

Kretzer, M. (2017). Information materials: Smart materials for adaptive architecture. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-35150-6

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.

Liu, C., Lai, F. & Gu, Z. (2015). Physical–virtual publicness of public space:An assessment framework. Urban Des Int. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-025-00303-5

Löschke, S.K. (Ed.). (2016). Materiality and Arcitecture: Introductory remarks. In Materiality and Architecture (1 ed., pp.1-11 ). Routledge.

Marcos, C. L. (2011). New materiality: Ideation, representation and digital fabrication. In 29th Conference on Education in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe (eCAADe) (pp. 351-360). Ljubljana. https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.2011.351

Moussavi, F. (2009). The function of form. Actar and Harvard University Graduate School of Design.

New-Territories. (n.d.). I'mlostinParis/2009. Retrieved March 15, 2026, form https://www.new-territories.com/lostinparis.htm

Nilsson, F. (2013). Architectural assemblages and materializations–changing notions of tectonics and materiality in contemporary architecture. In P.J. Crus (Ed.). Structures and Architecture: New concepts, applications and challenges (pp. 408-416). CRC Press.

Önder, D. (2025). Yeni ontolojilerin felsefi kartografisi ve tartışma konuları. FLSF Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (41), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.53844/flsf.1731400

Oxman, N. (2010). Structuring materiality: Design fabrication of heterogeneous materials. Architectural Design, 80(4), 78–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.1110

Oxman, N. (2012). Material Computation. In Bob Sheil (Ed.), Manufacturing the bespoke: Making and prototyping architecture (pp.256-264). John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Parisi, L. (2013). Contagious architecture: Computation, aesthetics, and space. mit Press

Parlac, V. (2021). Material dynamics in architecture. Plan Journal, 6(2), 501-520. https://doi.org/10.15274/tpj.2021.06.02.13

Picon, A. (2004). Architecture and the virtual: Towards a new materiality?. Praxis: Journal of Wri¬ting + Building, (6), 114-121. https://nrs.harvard.edu/URN-3:HUL.INSTREPOS:37373270

Picon, A. (2010). Digital culture in architecture: An introduction for the design professions. Birkhäuser.

Picon, A. (2024). The materiality of architecture, between the rise of the Digital Age and the advent of the Anthropocene. Perspectives in Architecture and Urbanism, 1(2), 100019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pau.2024.100019

Porter, T. (2004). Archispeak: an illustrated guide to architectural terms. Routledge.

Senagala, M. (2010). Deconstructing materiality. Harderials, softerials, minderials, and the transformation of architecture. In SIGraDi 2010_Proceedings of the 14th Congress of the Iberoamerican Society of Digital Graphics (pp. 142-145). Bogotá, Colombia. https://itc.scix.net/pdfs/sigradi2010_142.content.pdf

Smith, K. (Ed.). (2012). Material and immaterial. In Introducing architectural theory: Debating a discipline (pp.105-143). Routledge.

Spuybroek, L. (2011). The symphaty of things: Ruskin and the ecology of the design. Bloomsbury.

Tekeli, İ. (2023). Yaşamda özel alan ile kamusal alan ayrımının oluşumu ve karşılıklı konumları ile ilişkilerinin sürekli yeniden tanımlanmakta olması ne tür toplumsal sonuçlar yaratıyor?. Efil Journal of Economic Research, 6(1), 1-26. https://pdf.journalagent.com/planlama/pdfs/PLAN_29_3_195_201.pdf

The Living., & Jeremijenko, N. (2013). Amphibious architecture. In A.L. Harrison (Ed.), Architectural theories of the enviroment: Posthuman territory (pp.288-295). Routledge.

Thomas, K. L. (2022). Building materials: Material theory and the architectural specification. Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.

Tuin, I. V. D., & Dolphijn, R. (Eds.).(2012). New materialism: Interviews & cartographies. Open humanities press.

V2_ Lab for the Unstable Media (n.d). D-TOWER. V2.nl. https://v2.nl/works/d-tower

Publicado

2026-09-02

Cómo citar

Kandemir, S. S., & Aksoy, M. (2026). La nueva materialidad como correspondencia: Ejemplos tecnológicos emergentes en los espacios públicos. Street Art & Urban Creativity, 12(4), 537–558. https://doi.org/10.62161/sauc.v12.6375

Número

Sección

Artículos de investigación