Linguistic landscape and gender

Reading the city as an educational tool

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62161/sauc.v12.6194

Keywords:

Linguistic Landscape, Gender perspective, Teacher education, Educational innovation, Critical pedagogy, Urban spaces, Digital map

Abstract

This paper presents a teaching innovation project that examines how the urban linguistic landscape reflects and reproduces gender inequalities and how its study can function as a pedagogical resource. The project was structured in three phases: an initial assessment of students’ knowledge and attitudes, the implementation of a teaching proposal, and a comparative evaluation of its impact. The methods employed included pre-test and post-test questionnaires, virtual seminars for theoretical development, analysis of visual materials drawn from urban signage, and reflective reports that integrated theory and practice from a gender perspective. Analysis of 272 responses indicates that students developed increased competence in critically addressing language use and the representation of gender in public spaces. The project concludes with the creation of a collaborative digital map, offering a transferable model for integrating linguistic landscape analysis into teacher training.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Global Statistics ℹ️

Cumulative totals since publication
0
Views
0
Downloads
0
Total
Downloads by format:
PDF (Español (España)) 0 PDF 0

References

Barthes, R. (1986). Semiology and the urban. In M. Gottdiener & A. Ph. Lagopoulos (Eds.), The city and the sign: An introduction to urban semiotics (pp. 87–98). Columbia University Press.

Blommaert, J. (2013). Ethnography, superdiversity and linguistic landscapes: Chronicles of complexity. Multilingual Matters.

Eckert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (2013). Language and gender (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139245883

Flaherty, M. (2001). How a language gender system creeps into perception. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(1), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/002202210103200100

Friedrich, M. C. G., & Heise, E. (2019). Does the use of gender-fair language influence the comprehensibility of texts? An experiment using an authentic contract manipulating single role nouns and pronouns. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 78(1), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000223

Gutiérrez-Mora, D., & Oto-Peralías, D. (2022). Gendered cities: Studying urban gender bias through street names. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 49(6), 1792–1809. https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083211068844

Gygax, P., Gabriel, U., Sarrasin, O., Oakhill, J., & Garnham, A. (2008). Generically intended, but specifically interpreted: When beauticians, musicians, and mechanics are all men. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(3), 464–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960701702035

Hu, J., & Escribano Angulo, J. M. (2023). Revisión y perspectivas futuras de la investigación sobre paisaje lingüístico: un análisis bibliométrico. Revista Digital de Políticas Lingüísticas, 18, 169–197.

Kolotouchkina, O. (2018). Creatividad y la identidad cultural urbana: Experiencias destacadas en las ciudades contemporáneas [Creativity and urban cultural identity: Best practices in contemporary cities]. Revista Internacional de Cultura Visual, 5(1), 1–8. Global Knowledge Academics. http://journals.epistemopolis.org/index.php/imagen

Lakoff, R. (1973). Language and woman’s place. Language in Society, 2(1), 45–80. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4166707

Landry, R., & Bourhis, R. (1997). Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic vitality: An empirical study. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16(1), 23–49.

Morlan, M., & Byrne, S. (2024). Language choice and identity in the linguistic landscape of Barcelona. Social Semiotics, 34(5), 892–918. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2023.2223146

Moustaoui Srhir, A. (2019). Dos décadas de estudios del paisaje lingüístico: Enfoques teórico-metodológicos y nuevos desafíos en la investigación. Signo y Seña, 35, 7–28. https://doi.org/10.34096/sys.n35.6935

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en

Organización de las Naciones Unidas. (2015). Transformar nuestro mundo: La Agenda 2030 para el Desarrollo Sostenible. Naciones Unidas. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda

Pons Rodríguez, L. (2024). Corpus PLANEO: Metodología y resultados de un corpus de paisaje lingüístico andaluz. Philologia Hispalensis, 38(1), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.12795/PH.2024.v38.i01.06

Sáez Rivera, D. M. (2021). El paisaje lingüístico como herramienta pedagógica para la enseñanza de la lingüística: Un estudio de caso en la confección de blogs especializados en español. Recursos para el Aula de Español: Investigación y Enseñanza, 1(1), 167–204.

Santana Negrín, L., & González García, C. (2025). El paisaje lingüístico-visual como herramienta para el desarrollo de la competencia global en adolescentes. En A. Neubauer & C. Fernández-Aragón (Coords.), Educar para la ciudadanía global. Cambiar el mundo desde la escuela. Narcea.

Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2003). Discourses in place: Language in the material world. Routledge.

Shirahata, M., & Lahti, M. (2022). Language ideological landscapes for students in university language policies: Inclusion, exclusion, or hierarchy. Current Issues in Language Planning, 24(3), 272–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2022.2088165

The jamovi project. (2025). jamovi (Version 2.6) [Computer software]. https://www.jamovi.org

Yousufi, M., Loukissas, Y., & Hyde, A. (2023). Bridging data and experiences: Engaging youth in digital civics through participatory mapmaking for resilience. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.16957

Published

2026-09-03

How to Cite

Santana Negrín, L., Arrieta Castillo, C., Pérez Asperilla, E., & González García, C. (2026). Linguistic landscape and gender: Reading the city as an educational tool. Street Art & Urban Creativity, 12(5), 139–159. https://doi.org/10.62161/sauc.v12.6194

Issue

Section

Research articles