Evolution of Communication Strategies Used by Universities in Southern Spain on Twitter
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62161/revvisual.v17.5857Keywords:
Communication, University, Twitter, Social media, Covid-19Abstract
This study examines the evolution of communication strategies on Twitter by 12 universities in southern Spain and Portugal during the pre-lockdown, lockdown, and post-lockdown phases of the COVID-19 pandemic. Based on the analysis of over 7,000 posts, changes were identified in formats, objectives, topics, audiences, and performance. Images were predominant (71.1%), and the use of emojis and hashtags increased. During lockdown, the main objective was to inform, while inspiring and educating gained importance afterwards. The most common topics were events, human and institutional support, and the main audience was the general community. Posts saw the highest engagement during lockdown, reflecting strong social commitment. The study concludes that universities adapted effectively to changing contexts, showing that academic quality does not necessarily ensure greater communicative impact. Emotionally intelligent and context-aware communication management was key, positioning Twitter as an essential institutional tool for maintaining connection during a global crisis.
Downloads
Global Statistics ℹ️
6
Views
|
3
Downloads
|
9
Total
|
References
Aldeanueva-Fernández, I., y Arrabal-Sánchez, G. (2018). La comunicación y medición de la Responsabilidad Social Universitaria: Redes sociales y propuesta de indicadores. Revista digital de investigación en docencia universitaria, 12(1), 121-136.
Almeida, E., & Morais, N. S. (2020). The Use of Facebook and Instagram in Communication with New Students: the Case of Portuguese Public Universities. SIIE, 27(33).
Amaral, I., y Santos, S. (2020a). Social networks and institutional communication: The case of portuguese universities. Prisma Social, 28, 20-45.
Blank, C. A. (2013). SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social y behavioral research. Journal of Music Therapy, 50(4), 321-325.
Bustos-González, A. (2019). Tránsito de universidad docente a universidad de investigación. ¿Un problema de información académica, de taxonomías o de rankings universitarios? Profesional de la información, 28(4), e280422. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.jul.22
Capriotti, P., Losada-Díaz, J.-C., y Martínez-Gras, R. (2023). Evaluating the content strategy developed by universities on social media. El Profesional de la información, 32(2), e320210. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.mar.10
Duque-Rengel, V. y Valerazo-González, K. (2021, June). Crisis Communication in Times of COVID-19: Ecuadorian university case study. In 2021 16th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI) (pp. 1-7). IEEE.Ebrahim, H., y Seo, H. (2019). Visual Public Relations in Middle Eastern Higher Education: Content Analysis of Twitter (X) Images. Media Watch, 10(1), Ebrahim, H., y Seo, H. (2019). Visual Public Relations in Middle Eastern Higher Education: Content Analysis of Twitter (X) Images. Media Watch, 10(1), 41-53. https://doi.org/10.15655/mw/2019/v10i1/49563
Ferrer-Serrano, M., Latorre-Martínez, M.-P., y Lozano-Blasco, R. (2020). Universidades y comunicación. Papel de Twitter (X) durante el inicio de la crisis sanitaria de la Covid-19. El profesional de la información, 29(6), e290612. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.nov.12
García-Gordillo, M., Ramos-Serrano, M., y Fernández García, S. (2017). Manual de uso y estilo de redes sociales de la Universidad de Sevilla. Universidad de Sevilla.
García-Gordillo, M., Ramos-Serrano, M., y Rivas-de-Roca, R. (2023). Beyond Erasmus. Communication of European Universities alliances on social media. El Profesional de la información, 32(4), e320404. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.jul.04
Kimmons, R., & Veletsianos, G. (2016). Scholarly engagement on Twitter: A study of the academic Twitter network. The Journal of Higher Education, 87(5), 1-25.
Kimmons, R., Veletsianos, G., y Woodward, S. (2017). Institutional Uses of Twitter (X) in U.S. Higher Education. Innovative Higher Education, 42, 97-111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-016-9375-6
Manca, S., & Ranieri, M. (2016). Is it a tool suitable for learning? A critical review of the literature on Twitter in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 1-10.
Martínez-Cardama, S., y Pacios, A. R. (2020). Twitter (X) communication of university libraries in the face of Covid-19. Profesional de la información, 29(6), e290618. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.nov.18
Moreno, Á., Monsalve, A. M. S., Molleda, J. C., Athaydes, A., Herrera, M., y Nobell, A. Á. (2017). Latin American Communication Monitor 2016-2017 Tendencias en comunicación estratégica: Big data, automatización, engagement, influencers, coaching y competencias. Resultados de una encuesta en 17 países.: Tendencias en comunicación estratégica: Big data, automatización, engagement, influencers, coaching y competencias. Resultados de una encuesta en 17 países.
Motta, J., & Barbosa, M. (2018). Social media as a marketing tool for European and North American universities and colleges. Journal of Intercultural Management, 10(3), 125-154.Ortiz, D., y Greene, J. (2007). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Qualitative Research Journal, 6(2), 205-208.
Pérez-Bonaventura, M., Fortó-Areny, J., & Mariño-Mesías, R. M. (2023). Las Redes Sociales de Universidades Públicas de Andorra, España y Francia: Estudio y análisis de las redes sociales de universidades públicas de Andorra, España y Francia. VISUAL REVIEW. International Visual Culture Review/Revista Internacional de Cultura Visual, 14(2), 1-13.
Peruta, A., y Shields, A. B. (2018). Marketing your university on social media: A content analysis of Facebook post types and formats. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 28(2), 175-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2018.1442896
Saraite-Sariene, L., Alonso-Cañadas, J., Galán-Valdivieso, F., & Caba-Pérez, C. (2019). Non-financial information versus financial as a key to the stakeholder engagement: A higher education perspective. Sustainability, 12(1), 331.
Segura-Mariño, A. G., Paniagua-Rojano, F. J., y Fernández-Sande, M. (2020). Metodología para evaluar la comunicación universitaria en Facebook y Twitter (X) . Prisma Social, 28, 127-144.
Segura-Mariño, A. G., Ulloa-Erazo, N., y Paniagua, F. J. (2019). Cualidades y desafíos de la comunicación en las universidades de Ecuador. RISTI - Revista Ibérica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informação, E20, 414-426.
Simancas-González, E., y García-López, M. (2017). Gestión de la comunicación en las universidades públicas españolas. El profesional de la información, 26(4), 735-744.
Simancas-González, E., y García-López, M. (2022). La comunicación de las universidades públicas españolas: Situación actual y nuevos desafíos. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 28(1), 217-226. https://doi.org/10.5209/esmp.76011
Simón-Onieva, J. E. (2017). Uso de las Redes Sociales por las universidades públicas andaluzas. Análisis de contenido de la cuenta oficial de Twitter (X) . Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 23(1), 631-645. https://doi.org/10.5209/ESMP.55618
Thelen, P., y Linjuan-Men, R. (2018). Strategic use of Facebook for public engagement in higher education institutions. Public Relations Journal, 12(2), 1-27.Urquía, Í. (2024). Universidades Españolas en TikTok: La Eficacia de los Trends y Challenges en la Generación de Eengagement. VISUAL REVIEW. International Visual Culture Review/Revista Internacional de Cultura Visual, 16(8), 15-27.
Urquía, Í. (2024). Universidades Españolas en TikTok: La Eficacia de los Trends y Challenges en la Generación de Eengagement. VISUAL REVIEW. International Visual Culture Review/Revista Internacional de Cultura Visual, 16(8), 15-27.
Vegas Sernaqué, C. M. F. (2022). Análisis de los contenidos de las universidades en redes sociales: El caso de la Universidad de Piura en Facebook [Universidad de Piura]. https://pirhua.udep.edu.pe/bitstream/handle/11042/5661/TSP_INF_PER_2201.pdf?sequence=1yisAllowed=y
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Authors retain copyright and transfer to the journal the right of first publication and publishing rights

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Those authors who publish in this journal accept the following terms:
-
Authors retain copyright.
-
Authors transfer to the journal the right of first publication. The journal also owns the publishing rights.
-
All published contents are governed by an Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Access the informative version and legal text of the license. By virtue of this, third parties are allowed to use what is published as long as they mention the authorship of the work and the first publication in this journal. If you transform the material, you may not distribute the modified work. -
Authors may make other independent and additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., inclusion in an institutional repository or publication in a book) as long as they clearly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and recommended to publish their work on the Internet (for example on institutional and personal websites), following the publication of, and referencing the journal, as this could lead to constructive exchanges and a more extensive and quick circulation of published works (see The Effect of Open Access).