Pensamiento lógico y programática computacional en estudiantes de ingeniería

Rubén Alexandre More Valencia; Juan Manuel  Tume Ruiz; Antia  Rangel Vega

doi:10.37467/revvisual.v9.3784

Autores/as

Rubén Alexandre More Valencia Universidad Nacional de Piura
Juan Manuel Tume Ruiz Universidad Nacional de Piura
Antia Rangel Vega Universidad Nacional de Piura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37467/revvisual.v9.3784

Palabras clave:

Pensamiento, Pensamiento Lógico, Programática Computacional, Comunicación, Enseñanza Ingeniería, Estudiantes Ingeniería

Resumen

Los propósitos de los estudios sobre pensamiento lógico computacional prevén que es posible investigar con esfuerzos experimentales, las habilidades previas de lógica y matemática para estudiantes de ingeniería con paquetes de software y aplicaciones, en forma paralela dar soporte a los estudios universitarios de nivel superior, se logró que docentes impacten con co-creación, siendo colaborativo su trabajo de liderazgo, así como motivador y director, con usos de programática computacional, las herramientas analíticas integradas en capacidades de estudiantes, no solo permitió colaboración, también desarrollos y progreso para construir su propio conocimiento, en un proceso descrito por la teoría pedagógica del construccionismo.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Chan, S.-W., Looi, C.-K., Ho, W. K., Huang, W., Seow, P., & Wu, L. (2021). Learning number patterns through computational thinking activities: A Rasch model analysis. Heliyon, 7(9), e07922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07922 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07922

Disessa, A. A. (2004). Metarepresentation: Native competence and targets for instruction. Cognition and instruction, 22(3), 293-331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2203_2

Hooshyar, D., Malva, L., Yang, Y., Pedaste, M., Wang, M., & Lim, H. (2021). An adaptive educational computer game: Effects on students’ knowledge and learning attitude in computational thinking. Computers in Human Behavior, 114, 106575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106575 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106575

Kazimoglu, C., Kiernan, M., Bacon, L., & Mackinnon, L. (2012). A Serious Game for Developing Computational Thinking and Learning Introductory Computer Programming. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 1991-1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.938 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.938

Kong, S. C., & Wang, Y. Q. (2020). Formation of computational identity through computational thinking perspectives development in programming learning: A mediation analysis among primary school students. Computers in Human Behavior, 106, 106230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106230 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106230

Kong, S. C., & Wang, Y. Q. (2021). Item response analysis of computational thinking practices: Test characteristics and students’ learning abilities in visual programming contexts. Computers in Human Behavior, 122, 106836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106836 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106836

Kong, S.-C., Lai, M., & Sun, D. (2020). Teacher development in computational thinking: Design and learning outcomes of programming concepts, practices and pedagogy. Computers & Education, 151, 103872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103872 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103872

Lei, H., Chiu, M. M., Li, F., Wang, X., & Geng, Y. (2020). Computational thinking and academic achievement: A meta-analysis among students. Children and Youth Services Review, 118, 105439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105439 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105439

Leonard, J., Mitchell, M., Barnes-Johnson, J., Unertl, A., Outka-Hill, J., Robinson, R., & Hester-Croff, C. (2018). Preparing Teachers to Engage Rural Students in Computational Thinking Through Robotics, Game Design, and Culturally Responsive Teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(4), 386-407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117732317 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117732317

Lu, J., & Law, N. (2012). Online peer assessment: Effects of cognitive and affective feedback. Instructional Science, 40(2), 257-275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9177-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9177-2

Marcelino, M. J., Pessoa, T., Vieira, C., Salvador, T., & Mendes, A. J. (2018). Learning Computational Thinking and scratch at distance. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 470-477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.025

More, R. A. (2018). Engineering techniques and methods for the process of teaching and learning in Information and Communication Technologies using social video in students of the University of Piura. 2, 139-143. Scopus.

Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991). Situating constructionism. Constructionism, 36(2), 1-11.

Relkin, E., de Ruiter, L. E., & Bers, M. U. (2021). Learning to code and the acquisition of computational thinking by young children. Computers & Education, 169, 104222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104222 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104222

Tikva, C., & Tambouris, E. (2021). A systematic mapping study on teaching and learning Computational Thinking through programming in higher education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, 100849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100849 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100849

Tucker-Raymond, E., Cassidy, M., & Puttick, G. (2021). Science teachers can teach computational thinking through distributed expertise. Computers & Education, 173, 104284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104284 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104284

Willermark, S. (2018). Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge: A Review of Empirical Studies Published From 2011 to 2016. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(3), 315-343. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117713114 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117713114

Yadav, A., Mayfield, C., Zhou, N., Hambrusch, S., & Korb, J. T. (2014). Computational Thinking in Elementary and Secondary Teacher Education. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 14(1), 5:1-5:16. https://doi.org/10.1145/2576872 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2576872