Social Norms and Unintended Effects in Audiovisual Gambling Prevention Campaigns

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62161/revvisual.v17.5932

Keywords:

Problem gambling, Prevention campaigns, Boomerang effect, Public health, Social validation, Persuasion

Abstract

Audiovisual public health campaigns on social media often use normative information to discourage unhealthy behaviors. While prescriptive norms suggest appropriate behavior, descriptive norms highlight the prevalence of undesirable actions. Research shows that descriptive norms can sometimes backfire, reinforcing the behaviors they aim to reduce (boomerang effect). However, their impact on gambling prevention remains underexplored. To address this gap, we conducted a systematic review using Web of Science, Scopus, Medline, and PsycInfo via EBSCO Discovery. This review examines how descriptive norms affect gambling prevention campaigns and provides evidence-based recommendations to enhance the effectiveness of gambling-related messaging 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Global Statistics ℹ️

Cumulative totals since publication
18
Views
13
Downloads
31
Total
Downloads by format:
PDF (Español (España)) 8 PDF 5

References

APA. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Association.

Berkowitz, A. D. (2003). The social norms approach: Theory, research and annotated bibliography. https://doi.org/http://alanberkowitz.com/articles/social_norms.pdf

Browne, M., Bellringer, M., Greer, N., Kolandai-Matchett, K., Langham, E., Rockloff, M., Du Preez, K. P., & Abbott, M. (2017). Measuring the Burden of Gambling Harm in New Zealand. https://openrepository.aut.ac.nz/server/api/core/bitstreams/8b14657b-5e9a-41c0-8331-bfdec3545b4f/content

Byrne, D. P., Nauze, A. La, & Martin, L. A. (2018). Tell me something I don’t already know: informedness and the impact of information programs. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 100(3), 510–527. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_A_00695

Byrne, S., & Hart, P. S. (2009). The boomerang effect a synthesis of findings and a preliminary theoretical framework. Annals of the International Communication Association, 33(1), 3–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2009.11679083

Chabé-Ferret, S., Le Coent, P., Reynaud, A., Subervie, J., & Lepercq, D. (2019). Can we nudge farmers into saving water? Evidence from a randomised experiment. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 46(3), 393–416. https://doi.org/10.1093/ERAE/JBZ022

Cialdini, R. B., Demaine, L. J., Sagarin, B. J., Barrett, D. W., Rhoads, K., & Winter, P. L. (2006). Managing social norms for persuasive impact. Social Influence, 1(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510500181459

Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1015–1026. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015

De Jans, S., Cauberghe, V., Hudders, L., & Rys, F. (2023). An experimental study to examine whether and how Flemish and Dutch harm prevention messages on gambling advertising affect consumers’ gambling-related beliefs and intentions. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 37(6), 771–784. https://doi.org/10.1037/ADB0000951

Office for Health Improvement & Disparities (2023). Gambling-related harms evidence review: sumary. https://Gambling-related harms evidence review: summary - GOV.UK

Erceg-Hurn, D. M., & Steed, L. G. (2011). Does Exposure to Cigarette Health Warnings Elicit Psychological Reactance in Smokers? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(1), 219–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1559-1816.2010.00710.X

Ferrara, P., Vural, M., Cokugras, F. C., Nigri, L., Pop, T. L., Mestrovic, J., Giardino, I., Namazova-Baranova, L., & Pettoello-Mantovani, M. (2019). The risk of gambling disorders in children and adolescents. The Journal of Pediatrics, 210, 245–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JPEDS.2019.04.005

Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian problem gambling index: Final report. https://nyproblemgambling.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/MCCORMICK-RESOURCE-PGSI-Instrument-1.pdf

Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202

Gabellini, E., Lucchini, F., & Gattoni, M. E. (2023). Prevalence of problem gambling: A meta-analysis of recent empirical research (2016-2022). Journal of Gambling Studies, 39(3), 1027–1057. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10899-022-10180-0

García-Castro, J., Cancela, A., & Cárdaba, M. A. M. (2023). Neural cue-reactivity in pathological gambling as evidence for behavioral addiction: a systematic review. Current Psychology, 42, 28026–28037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03915-0

García-Castro, J., Cancela, A., & Martín-Cárdaba, M.-Á. (2022). Effects of advertising on problem gambling: Neural-cue reactivity as a possible underlying mechanism. Profesional de La Información, 31(6), e310614. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2022.nov.14

Goh, E., Ng, V., & Brenda S. A. Yeoh, B. (2016). The family exclusion order as a harm-minimisation measure for casino gambling: the case of Singapore. International Gambling Studies, 3, 373–390. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2016.1211169

González-Roz, A., Fernández-Hermida, J. R., Weidberg, S., Martínez-Loredo, V., & Secades-Villa, R. (2017). Prevalence of problem gambling among adolescents: A comparison across modes of access, gambling activities, and levels of severity. Journal of Gambling Studies, 33(2), 371–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10899-016-9652-4/METRICS

Håkansson, A. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 on Online Gambling – A General Population Survey During the Pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.568543

Hofmarcher, T., Romild, U., Spångberg, J., Persson, U., & Håkansson, A. (2020). The societal costs of problem gambling in Sweden. BMC Public Health, 20(1), 1921. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12889-020-10008-9

John, B., Holloway, K., Davies, N., May, T., Buhociu, M., Cousins, A. L., Thomas, S., & Roderique-Davies, G. (2020). Gambling harm as a global public health concern: A mixed method investigation of trends in wales. Frontiers in Public Health, 8(320). https://doi.org/10.3389/FPUBH.2020.00320/BIBTEX

John, P., & Blume, T. (2018). How best to nudge taxpayers? The impact of message simplification and descriptive social norms on payment rates in a central London local authority. Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, 1(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.30636/JBPA.11.10

Kang, Y., Cappella, J. N., & Fishbein, M. (2009). The effect of marijuana scenes in anti-marijuana public service announcements on adolescents’ evaluation of ad effectiveness. Health Communication, 24(6), 483–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410230903104269

Larimer, M. E., & Neighbors, C. (2003). Normative misperception and the impact of descriptive and injunctive norms on college student gambling. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors : Journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors, 17(3), 235–243. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-164X.17.3.235

Lemmel, F. K., & Morina, N. (2024). Efficacy of social norm interventions on addictive behaviours: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 31(5), e3057. https://doi.org/10.1002/CPP.3057

Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): a new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 144(9), 1184–1188. https://doi.org/10.1176/AJP.144.9.1184

Luquiens, A., Tanguy, M. L., Lagadec, M., Benyamina, A., Aubin, H. J., & Reynaud, M. (2016). The efficacy of three modalities of internet-based psychotherapy for non-treatment-seeking Online problem gamblers: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(2), e36. https://doi.org/10.2196/JMIR.4752

Martens, M. P., Arterberry, B. J., Takamatsu, S. K., Masters, J., & Dude, K. (2015). The efficacy of a personalized feedback-only intervention for at-risk college gamblers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 83(3), 494–499. https://doi.org/10.1037/A0038843

Meisel, M. K., & Goodie, A. S. (2014). Descriptive and injunctive social norms’ interactive role in gambling behavior. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 28(2), 592–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/A0036444

Mejías Martínez, G., & Cuesta Díaz, V. (2023). Análisis metodológico para la mejora de la comunicación en salud de los operadores de juegos: estudio de la iniciativa JuegosONCE.es. Revista De Comunicación Y Salud, 14, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.35669/rcys.2024.14.e338

Neighbors, C., Lostutter, T. W., Whiteside, U., Fossos, N., Walker, D. D., & Larimer, M. E. (2007). Injunctive norms and problem gambling among college students. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23(3), 259–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10899-007-9059-3

Neighbors, C., Rodriguez, L. M., Rinker, D. V., Gonzales, R. G., Agana, M., Tackett, J. L., & Foster, D. W. (2015). Efficacy of personalized normative feedback as a brief intervention for college student gambling: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 83(3), 500–511. https://doi.org/10.1037/A0039125

Perkins, J. M., Perkins, H. W., & Craig, D. W. (2010). Misperceptions of peer norms as a risk factor for sugar-sweetened beverage consumption among secondary school students. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 110(12), 1916–1921. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JADA.2010.09.008

Quigley, L. (2022). Gambling disorder and stigma: Opportunities for treatment and prevention. Current Addiction Reports, 9(4), 410–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40429-022-00437-4/METRICS

Richter, I., Thøgersen, J., & Klöckner, C. A. (2018). A Social Norms Intervention Going Wrong: Boomerang Effects from Descriptive Norms Information. Sustainability 2018, Vol. 10, Page 2848, 10(8), 2848. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU10082848

Saxton, J., Rodda, S. N., Booth, N., Merkouris, S. S., & Dowling, N. A. (2021). The efficacy of Personalized Normative Feedback interventions across addictions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS One, 16(4), e0248262. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0248262

Schultz, P., Nolan, J., Cialdini, R., Goldstein, N., & Griskevicius, V. (2007). The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 18(5), 429–434. https://doi.org/doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01917.x.

Snyder, L. B., & Blood, D. J. (1992). Caution: alcohol advertising and the Surgeon General’s warning in alcoholics beverage advertising. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 20, 37–53.

Ste-Marie, C., Gupta, R., & Derevensky, J. L. (2006). Anxiety and social stress related to adolescent gambling behavior and substance use. Journal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse, 15(4), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1300/J029V15N04_03

Tulloch, C., Browne, M., Hing, N., Rockloff, M., & Hilbrecht, M. (2023). How gambling harms others: The influence of relationship-type and closeness on harm, health, and wellbeing. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 12(3), 697. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2023.00036

Williams, R. J., Volberg, R. A., & Stevens, R. M. G. (2012). The population prevalence of problem gambling: methodological influences, standardized rates, jurisdictional differences, and worldwide trends. https://hdl.handle.net/10133/3068

Downloads

Published

2025-09-20

How to Cite

García Castro, J., Martínez , L., & Cárdaba, M. Ángel. (2025). Social Norms and Unintended Effects in Audiovisual Gambling Prevention Campaigns. VISUAL REVIEW. International Visual Culture Review Revista Internacional De Cultura Visual, 17(5), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.62161/revvisual.v17.5932

Issue

Vol. 17 No. 5 (2025)

Section

Research articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Authors retain copyright and transfer to the journal the right of first publication and publishing rights

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Those authors who publish in this journal accept the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright.

  2. Authors transfer to the journal the right of first publication. The journal also owns the publishing rights.

  3. All published contents are governed by an Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
    Access the informative version and legal text of the license. By virtue of this, third parties are allowed to use what is published as long as they mention the authorship of the work and the first publication in this journal. If you transform the material, you may not distribute the modified work.

  4. Authors may make other independent and additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., inclusion in an institutional repository or publication in a book) as long as they clearly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.

  5. Authors are allowed and recommended to publish their work on the Internet (for example on institutional and personal websites), following the publication of, and referencing the journal, as this could lead to constructive exchanges and a more extensive and quick circulation of published works (see The Effect of Open Access).