Pensamiento lógico y programática computacional en estudiantes de ingeniería

Rubén Alexandre More Valencia; Juan Manuel  Tume Ruiz; Antia  Rangel Vega

doi:10.37467/revvisual.v9.3784

Authors

Rubén Alexandre More Valencia Universidad Nacional de Piura
Juan Manuel Tume Ruiz Universidad Nacional de Piura
Antia Rangel Vega Universidad Nacional de Piura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37467/revvisual.v9.3784

Keywords:

Thought, Logical Thinking, Computational Programmatic, Communication, Teaching Engineering, Engineering students

Abstract

The purposes of studies on computational logical thinking foresee that it is possible, through experiment work, to do research on previous skills of logic and mathematics in engineering students, by using packages of software and applications and supporting these students in parallel. It was possible that teachers achieved impact by using co-creation, and, since their work was collaborative, this showed leadership, motivation, and guidance. By using computer programming and analytical tools integrated into the capacities of students, this not only allowed collaboration, but also development and progress for building their own knowledge, in a process according to the pedagogical theory of constructionism.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chan, S.-W., Looi, C.-K., Ho, W. K., Huang, W., Seow, P., & Wu, L. (2021). Learning number patterns through computational thinking activities: A Rasch model analysis. Heliyon, 7(9), e07922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07922 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07922

Disessa, A. A. (2004). Metarepresentation: Native competence and targets for instruction. Cognition and instruction, 22(3), 293-331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2203_2

Hooshyar, D., Malva, L., Yang, Y., Pedaste, M., Wang, M., & Lim, H. (2021). An adaptive educational computer game: Effects on students’ knowledge and learning attitude in computational thinking. Computers in Human Behavior, 114, 106575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106575 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106575

Kazimoglu, C., Kiernan, M., Bacon, L., & Mackinnon, L. (2012). A Serious Game for Developing Computational Thinking and Learning Introductory Computer Programming. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 1991-1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.938 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.938

Kong, S. C., & Wang, Y. Q. (2020). Formation of computational identity through computational thinking perspectives development in programming learning: A mediation analysis among primary school students. Computers in Human Behavior, 106, 106230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106230 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106230

Kong, S. C., & Wang, Y. Q. (2021). Item response analysis of computational thinking practices: Test characteristics and students’ learning abilities in visual programming contexts. Computers in Human Behavior, 122, 106836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106836 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106836

Kong, S.-C., Lai, M., & Sun, D. (2020). Teacher development in computational thinking: Design and learning outcomes of programming concepts, practices and pedagogy. Computers & Education, 151, 103872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103872 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103872

Lei, H., Chiu, M. M., Li, F., Wang, X., & Geng, Y. (2020). Computational thinking and academic achievement: A meta-analysis among students. Children and Youth Services Review, 118, 105439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105439 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105439

Leonard, J., Mitchell, M., Barnes-Johnson, J., Unertl, A., Outka-Hill, J., Robinson, R., & Hester-Croff, C. (2018). Preparing Teachers to Engage Rural Students in Computational Thinking Through Robotics, Game Design, and Culturally Responsive Teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(4), 386-407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117732317 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117732317

Lu, J., & Law, N. (2012). Online peer assessment: Effects of cognitive and affective feedback. Instructional Science, 40(2), 257-275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9177-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9177-2

Marcelino, M. J., Pessoa, T., Vieira, C., Salvador, T., & Mendes, A. J. (2018). Learning Computational Thinking and scratch at distance. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 470-477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.025

More, R. A. (2018). Engineering techniques and methods for the process of teaching and learning in Information and Communication Technologies using social video in students of the University of Piura. 2, 139-143. Scopus.

Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991). Situating constructionism. Constructionism, 36(2), 1-11.

Relkin, E., de Ruiter, L. E., & Bers, M. U. (2021). Learning to code and the acquisition of computational thinking by young children. Computers & Education, 169, 104222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104222 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104222

Tikva, C., & Tambouris, E. (2021). A systematic mapping study on teaching and learning Computational Thinking through programming in higher education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, 100849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100849 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100849

Tucker-Raymond, E., Cassidy, M., & Puttick, G. (2021). Science teachers can teach computational thinking through distributed expertise. Computers & Education, 173, 104284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104284 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104284

Willermark, S. (2018). Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge: A Review of Empirical Studies Published From 2011 to 2016. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(3), 315-343. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117713114 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117713114

Yadav, A., Mayfield, C., Zhou, N., Hambrusch, S., & Korb, J. T. (2014). Computational Thinking in Elementary and Secondary Teacher Education. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 14(1), 5:1-5:16. https://doi.org/10.1145/2576872 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2576872