A Critical Review of Visual Anthropology

Autores/as

  • Arjang Omrani University of Ghent

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37467/revvisual.v13.3382

Palabras clave:

Visual Anthropology, representation, observational realism, anthropology vs ethnography, sensory turn, experimental cinema

Resumen

This article aims to develop a critical overview of visual anthropology by exploring the main obstacles and pivotal challenges throughout its evolution. It explores the ongoing representational and logocentric orientations of mainstream anthropology that have caused the rejection of acknowledging audio-visual anthropology as valid academic work. Furthermore, by singling out the ocular-centric and visual realist tendencies that exist in visual anthropology, it is argued that, to some extent, it validates those criticisms and even has its roots in those representational and logocentric orientations. Within this article, a position is taken besides those who consider the 'sub-discipline' of visual anthropology as a critical approach to mainstream (social or cultural) anthropological studies. The arguments lead to the conclusion, suggesting that by distinguishing between ethnography and anthropology (Ingold: 2014 & 2017) a more diverse, creative, and comprehensive idea of audio-visual (multimodal) anthropology is probable.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Estadísticas globales ℹ️

Totales acumulados desde su publicación
1084
Visualizaciones
1333
Descargas
2417
Total

Citas

Alpers, S. (1983). The art of describing: Dutch art in the seventeenth century. Penguin.

Banks, M., & Ruby, J. (2011). Made to Be Seen. The University of the Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226036632.001.0001

Banks, M., & Zeitlyn, D. (2015). Visual Methods in Social Research. SAGE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473921702

Boellstorff, T. (2008). Coming of age in Second Life: An anthropologist explores the virtually human. Princeton University Press.

Boellstorff, T. (2021). Ethnography in virtual worlds: A handbook of method. Princeton University Press

Carta, S. (2015). Visual and Experiential Knowledge in Observational Cinema.re from https://journals.openedition.org/anthrovision/1480 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/anthrovision.1480

Crawford, P. (2010). Sounds of Silence. The aural in anthropology and ethnographic film. In G. Iversen, & J. Simonsen (Eds.) Beyond the visual: Sound and Image in Ethnographic and Documentary Film. (pp. 22–49). Intervention Press.

Fabian, J. (1983). Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes Its Object. (1st ed). Columbia University Press.

Grimshaw, A., & Ravetz, A. (2005). Visualizing Anthropology: Experimenting with Image-Based Ethnography. University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv36xw2x9

Grimshaw, A., & Ravetz, A. (2009). Rethinking observational cinema. Journal Of The Royal Anthropological Institute, 15(3), 538-556. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9655.2009.01573.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2009.01573.x

Hastrup, K., (1992). Anthropological visions: some notes on visual and textual authority. In P.I. Crawford & D. Turton (Eds.) Film as ethnography. University Press.

Henely, P., (2006). Putting Film to Work: Observational Cinema as Practical Ethnography. In S. Pink, L. Kurti, & A. Afonso (Eds.), Working Images: Visual Research and Representation in Ethnography. Routledge.

Howes, D. (2010). Sensual relations. Univ. of Michigan Press.

Ingold, T. (2000). The perception of the environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. Routledge.

Ingold, T. (2014). That’s enough about ethnography!. HAU: Journal Of Ethnographic Theory, 4(1), 383-395. doi: 10.14318/hau4.1.021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14318/hau4.1.021

Ingold, T. (2017). Anthropology contra ethnography. HAU: Journal Of Ethnographic Theory, 7(1), 21-26. doi: 10.14318/hau7.1.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14318/hau7.1.005

Jackson, M. (2013). Lifeworlds: Essays in Existential Anthropology. The University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226923666.001.0001

Loizos, P. (1997). First Exits from Observational Realism: Narrative Experiments in Recent Ethnographic Films. In H. Morphy, & M. Banks (Eds.) Rethinking Visual Anthropology (pp. 81-104) Yale University Press.

MacDougall, D. (1995). Beyond Observational Cinema. In P. Hockings. (Ed.) Principles of Visual Anthropology. (pp. 116-132). Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110290691.115

MacDougall, D. (2006). The corporeal image. Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400831562

Marcus, G. (1990). The Modernist Sensibility in Recent Ethnographic Writing and the Cinematic Metaphor of Montage. Society For Visual Anthropology Review, 6(1), 2-12. doi: 10.1525/var.1990.6.1.2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/var.1990.6.1.2

Marks, L. (2000). The Skin of the Film: Intercultural Cinema, Embodiment, and the Senses. Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1198x4c

Mitchell Thomas W.J. (1994). Picture Theory: Essays on Verbal and Visual Representation. The University of Chicago Press.

Mitchell Thomas W.J. (2005). Image Science: Iconology, Visual Culture, and Media Aesthetics. The University of Chicago Press.

Pink, S. (2006). The future of visual anthropology: Engaging the senses. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203003596

Ruby, J. (1975). Is an Ethnographic Film a Filmic Ethnography?. Studies In The Anthropology Of Visual Communications, 2(2), 104-111. doi: 10.1525/var.1975.2.2.104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/var.1975.2.2.104

Ruby, J. (2008). Towards an anthropological cinema. Retrieved 31 March 2021, from http://www.philbu.net/media-anthropology/ruby_anthrocinema.pdf

Stoller, P. (1997). Sensuous scholarship. University of Pennsylvania Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812203134

Suhr, C., & Willerslev, R. (2012). Can Film Show the Invisible?: The Work of Montage. in Ethnographic Filmmaking. Current Anthropology, 53(3), 282-301. doi: 10.1086/664920 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/664920

Taylor, L. (1996). Iconophobia. Transition, 69, 64. doi: 10.2307/2935240 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2935240

Wright, C. (1998). The Third Subject: Perspectives on Visual Anthropology. Anthropology Today, 14(4), 16-22. doi: 10.2307/2783352 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2783352

Wright, C., & Cox, R., (2012). Blurred Visions: Reflecting Visual Anthropology. In R. Fardon, & J. Gledhill. (Eds.) The SAGE Handbook of Social Anthropology (Vol. 2, pp. 116-129). Sage Publications

Descargas

Publicado

2023-03-09

Cómo citar

Omrani, A. (2023). A Critical Review of Visual Anthropology. VISUAL REVIEW. International Visual Culture Review Revista Internacional De Cultura Visual, 13(1), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.37467/revvisual.v13.3382

Número

Vol. 13 Núm. 1 (2023)

Sección

Artículos de reflexión crítica

Licencia

Los autores/as que publiquen en esta revista aceptan las siguientes condiciones: 

  1. Los autores/as conservan los derechos de autor.
  2. Los autores/as ceden a la revista el derecho de la primera publicación. La revista también posee los derechos de edición.
  3.  Todos los contenidos publicados se regulan mediante una Licencia Atribución/Reconocimiento-SinDerivados 4.0 Internacional. Acceda a la versión informativa y texto legal de la licencia. En virtud de ello, se permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado siempre que mencionen la autoría del trabajo y a la primera publicación en esta revista. Si transforma el material, no podrá distribuir el trabajo modificado.
  4. Los autores/as pueden realizar otros acuerdos contractuales independientes y adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del artículo publicado en esta revista (p. ej., incluirlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro) siempre que indiquen claramente que el trabajo se publicó por primera vez en esta revista.
  5. Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as a publicar su trabajo en Internet (por ejemplo en páginas institucionales o personales), una vez publicado en la revista y citando a la misma ya que puede conducir a intercambios productivos y a una mayor y más rápida difusión del trabajo publicado (vea The Effect of Open Access).