Divisions in Motion
Visual Affective Polarization on TikTok During the 2024 European Parliament Elections
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62161/revvisual.v17.6126Keywords:
Visual polarization, Affective polarization, Radical and far-right parties, TikTok, Politainment, Populism, Political communicationAbstract
Visual polarization is a key element of digital political communication, reinforcing group identity and deepening affective divisions. During the 2024 European elections, radical and far-right candidates used TikTok to modernize their image and promote polarizing, anti-establishment narratives. An analysis of N = 190 videos posted by seven candidates reveals a preference for emotionally charged, simplified content while avoiding interactive features. This strategy fostered in-group cohesion, heightened ideological divides, and increased the risk of misinformation, limiting substantive debate and mobilization. These findings highlight the role of visual rhetoric in shaping contemporary political discourse and its impact on polarization in digital environments.
Downloads
Global Statistics ℹ️
|
10
Views
|
9
Downloads
|
|
19
Total
|
|
References
Albertazzi, D., & Bonansinga, D. (2023). Beyond anger: The populist radical right on TikTok. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 32(3), 673–689. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2022.2163380
Amador, C. M. (2024). Extreme-right counterpublics in Latin America: Hispanidad, hashtags, and TikTokers in the era of late fascism. HIOL: Hispanic Issues On Line, 32, 76–101.
Barragán-Romero, A. I., Caro-Castaño, L., & Bellido-Pérez, E. (2024). La apropiación partidista del meme: Fandom y propaganda en las elecciones generales españolas de 2023. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 83, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.4185/rlcs-2025-2304
Bast, J. (2021). Managing the image: The visual communication strategy of European right-wing populist politicians on Instagram. Journal of Political Marketing. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2021.1984043
Battista, D. (2023). Knock, knock! The next wave of populism has arrived! An analysis of confirmations, denials, and new developments in a phenomenon that is taking center stage. Social Sciences, 12(2), Article 100. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12020100
Berrocal-Gonzalo, S., Quevedo-Redondo, R., & García-Beaudoux, V. (2022). Política pop online: Nuevas estrategias y liderazgos para nuevos públicos. Index.Comunicación, 12(1), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.33732/ixc/12/01Politi
Bonansinga, D. (2024). Visual de-demonisation: A new era of radical right mainstreaming. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13691481241259384
Boucher, V. (2022). Down the TikTok rabbit hole: Testing the TikTok algorithm’s contribution to right-wing extremist radicalization [Master’s thesis, Queen’s University]. QSpace Repository. http://hdl.handle.net/1974/30197
Carlson, C. R. (2019). Misogynistic hate speech and its chilling effect on women’s free expression during the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign. Journal of Hate Studies, 14(1), 97–111.
Cervi, L., & Marín-Lladó, C. (2021). What are political parties doing on TikTok? The Spanish case. Profesional de la Información, 30(4). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.jul.03
Cervi, L., Tejedor, S., & García-Blesa, F. (2023). TikTok and political communication: The latest frontier of politainment? A case study. Media and Communication, 11(2), 203–217. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i2.6390
Chadwick, A. (2017). The hybrid media system: Politics and power (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Chambers, S., & Kopstein, J. (2023). Wrecking the public sphere: The new authoritarians’ digital attack on pluralism and truth. Constellations: An International Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory, 30(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12620
Classen, K., Kollmer, A., Schlage, M., Schöpflin, A., Winkler, J., & Witerspan, H. (2024). Right-wing populist communication of the party AfD on TikTok: To what extent does the AfD use TikTok as part of its communication to win over young voters? In A. Godulla et al. (Eds.), The dynamics of digital influence: Communication trends in business, politics, and activism (pp. 100–122). Universität Leipzig.
Dalton, R. J. (1987). Generational change in elite political beliefs: The growth of ideological polarization. The Journal of Politics, 49(4), 976–997. https://doi.org/10.2307/2130780
De-Lima-Santos, M. F., Gonçalves, I., Quiles, M. G., Mesquita, L., & Ceron, W. (2023). Visual political communication in a polarized society: A longitudinal study of Brazilian presidential elections on Instagram. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2310.00349. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.00349
Donà, A. (2022). The rise of the radical right in Italy: The case of Fratelli d’Italia. Journal of Modern Italian Studies, 27(5), 775–794. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354571X.2022.2113216
Edelman Trust Barometer. (2024). A collision of trust, innovation, and politics. https://goo.su/zzOP1wk
Engesser, S., Fawzi, N., & Larsson, A. O. (2017). Populist online communication: Introduction to the special issue. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1279–1292. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1328525
Fernández Arriola, T. (2023). Far-right parties youth social media targeting: An analysis of Vox’s Instagram and TikTok activity (Master’s thesis, Charles University). Charles University Digital Repository https://dspace.cuni.cz/handle/20.500.11956/187369
Filimonov, K., Russmann, U., & Svensson, J. (2016). Picturing the party: Instagram and party campaigning in the 2014 Swedish elections. Social Media + Society, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116662179
Gamir-Ríos, J., Cano-Orón, L., & Lava-Santos, D. (2022). De la localización a la movilización: Evolución del uso electoral de Instagram en España de 2015 a 2019. Revista de Comunicación, 21(1), 159–179. https://doi.org/10.26441/RC21.1-2022-A8
Gidron, N., Adams, J., & Horne, W. (2020). American affective polarization in comparative perspective. Cambridge University Press.
González-Aguilar, J. M., Segado-Boj, F., & Makhortykh, M. (2023). Populist right parties on TikTok: Spectacularization, personalization, and hate speech. Media and Communication, 11(2), 232–240. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i2.6358
Goujard, C., Braun, E., & Scott, M. (2024, March 17). Europe’s far right uses TikTok to win youth vote. Politico. https://tinyurl.com/w2ad2448
Green, R. (2024, September 30). The year of elections: The rise of Europe’s far right. International Bar Association. https://tinyurl.com/7hsa6t6d
Heyna, P. (2024). Can TikTok drive support for populist radical right parties? Causal evidence from Germany. OSF Preprints. https://osf.io/yju9n/download
Hohner, J., Kakavand, A., & Rothut, S. (2024). Analyzing radical visuals at scale: How far-right groups mobilize on TikTok. Journal of Digital Social Research, 6(1), 10–30. https://doi.org/10.33621/jdsr.v6i1.200
Huddy, L., Mason, L., & Aarøe, L. (2015). Expressive partisanship: Campaign involvement, political emotion, and partisan identity. American Political Science Review, 109(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055414000604
Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405–431. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs038
Jiménez-Aguilar, F. (2023). The new Spanish far-right movement: Crisis, national priority and ultranationalist charity. Nations and Nationalism, 30(3), 476–492. https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12992
Knudsen, E. (2021). Affective Polarization in Multiparty Systems? Comparing Affective Polarization Towards Voters and Parties in Norway and the United States. Scandinavian Political Studies, 44, 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12186
Kubin, E., & von Sikorski, C. (2021). The role of (social) media in political polarization: A systematic review. Annals of the International Communication Association, 45(3), 188–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2021.1976070
Lilleker, D., & Pérez-Escolar, M. (2023). Demonizing migrants in contexts of extremism: Analysis of hate speech in the UK and Spain. Politics and Governance, 11(2), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i2.6302
López-Cañellas, N. (2022). The dangers of underestimating TikTok, or why Trump might have been right (for all the wrong reasons) [Master’s thesis, Instituto Universitario Europeo]. Cadmus EUI Research Repository. https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/74795
Manucci, L. (2021). Forty years of populism in the European Parliament. População e Sociedade, 35, 25–42. https://doi.org/10.52224/21845263/rev35a2
Marcos-García, S., Zamora-Medina, R., & Egea-Barquero, M. (in press). Visual Polarization: Instagram’s Role in Shaping Collective Identity and Emotional Divisions. The Case of the 2023 General Elections in Spain. ICONO 14. Revista Científica de Comunicación y Tecnologías Emergentes.
Martín-Cubas, J., Bodoque, A., Pavía, J. M., Tasa, V., & Veres-Ferrer, E. (2018). The “Big Bang” of the populist parties in the European Union: The 2014 European Parliament election. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 32(2), 168–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2018.1523711
Morejón-Llamas, N. (2023). Política española en TikTok: Del aterrizaje a la consolidación de la estrategia comunicativa. Revista Prisma Social, (40), 238–261. https://revistaprismasocial.es/article/view/4833
Mudde, C. (1995). Right-wing extremism analyzed: A comparative analysis of the ideologies of three alleged right-wing extremist parties (NPD, NDP, CP'86). European Journal of Political Research, 27(2), 203–224.
Mudde, C. (2014). The far right and the European elections. Current History, 113(761), 98–103. https://doi.org/10.1525/curh.2014.113.761.98
Mudde, C. (2019). The 2019 EU elections: Moving the center. Journal of Democracy, 30(4), 20–34. https://tinyurl.com/y9zzsuyt
Mudde, C. (2024). The far right and the 2024 European elections. Intereconomics, 59(2), 61–65. https://tinyurl.com/src6rkpw
Nai, A., & Maier, J. (2021). The wrath of candidates: Drivers of fear and enthusiasm appeals in election campaigns across the globe. Journal of Political Marketing, 23(1), 74–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2021.1930327
Oskolkov, P., Lissitsa, S., & Lewin, E. (2024). Lenin, Putin, and Rage Guy: Internet memes in the discourse of a Russian far-right community. Journal of Political Communication, 19(2), 234–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2024.2420671
Ozduzen, O., Ferenczi, N., & Holmes, I. (2023). ‘Let us teach our children’: Online racism and everyday far-right ideologies on TikTok. Visual Studies, 38(5), 834–850. https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2023.2274890
Pérez-Díaz, P. L., & Arroyas Langa, E. (in press). El populismo disruptivo de Javier Milei. European Public & Social Innovation Review.
Pérez-Curiel, C., & Baptista, J. P. (2024). Lying on social media: Disinformation strategies of Iberian populist radical right. In D. Lilleker, M. S. Negrine, & E. Thorsen (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Political Communication (pp. 457–472). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003388937-47
Picheta, R. (2024, June 10). A far-right surge upends national politics. Here’s what we learned from the European elections. CNN World. https://tinyurl.com/nhzkss45
Popivanov, B. (2022). Putting the blame back on Brussels: Strategic communication of the populist radical right in the 2019 European Parliament elections. European Politics and Society, 25(1), 54–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2022.2082708
Rebollo-Bueno, S., & Ferreira, I. (2023). Desinformación y polarización en la publicidad política de la extrema derecha en España y Portugal. Estudos em Comunicação, 36, 115–132. https://doi.org/10.25768/1646-4974n36a07
Rifesser, B. (2023). An interdisciplinary analysis of the weaponization of TikTok [Master’s thesis, Liverpool John Moores University]. Liverpool John Moores University Repository. https://tinyurl.com/ynu27wtx
Statista (2024). Distribution of TikTok users worldwide as of July 2024, by age and gender. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1299771/tiktok-global-user-age-distribution/
Steinert-Threlkeld, Z. C., Chan, A. M., & Joo, J. (2022). How state and protester violence affect protest dynamics. Journal of Politics, 84(2), 798–813. https://doi.org/10.1086/715600
Szczerbiak, A., & Taggart, P. (2024). Euroscepticism and anti-establishment parties in Europe. Journal of European Integration, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2024.2329634
Vahter, M., & Jakobson, M. L. (2023). The moral rhetoric of populist radical right: The case of the Sweden Democrats. Journal of Political Ideologies, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2023.2242795
Volk, S. (2022). Radical right populism in Germany: AfD, Pegida, and the Identitarian movement. Journal of Contemporary European Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2022.2088956
Weimann, G., & Masri, N. (2020). Research note: Spreading hate on TikTok. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 46(5), 752–765.
Widholm, A., Ekman, M., & Larsson, A. O. (2024). A right-wing wave on TikTok? Ideological orientations, platform features, and user engagement during the early 2022 election campaign in Sweden. Social Media + Society, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051241269266
Widmann, T. (2020). How emotional are populists really? Factors explaining emotional appeals in the communication of political parties. Political Psychology, 42(1), 163–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12693
Yarchi, M., Baden, C., & Kligler-Vilenchik, N. (2020). Political polarization on the digital sphere: A cross-platform, over-time analysis of interactional, positional, and affective polarization on social media. Political Communication, 38(1–2), 98–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1785067
Zamora-Medina, R. (2023). Politainment as dance: Visual storytelling on TikTok among Spanish political parties. In D. Lilleker & A. Veneti (Eds.), Research Handbook on Visual Politics (pp. 228–243). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Zamora-Medina, R., Suminas, A., & Fahmy, S. S. (2023). Securing the youth vote: A comparative analysis of digital persuasion on TikTok among political actors. Media and Communication, 11(2), 218–231. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i2.6348
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Authors retain copyright and transfer to the journal the right of first publication and publishing rights
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Those authors who publish in this journal accept the following terms:
-
Authors retain copyright.
-
Authors transfer to the journal the right of first publication. The journal also owns the publishing rights.
-
All published contents are governed by an Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Access the informative version and legal text of the license. By virtue of this, third parties are allowed to use what is published as long as they mention the authorship of the work and the first publication in this journal. If you transform the material, you may not distribute the modified work. -
Authors may make other independent and additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., inclusion in an institutional repository or publication in a book) as long as they clearly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and recommended to publish their work on the Internet (for example on institutional and personal websites), following the publication of, and referencing the journal, as this could lead to constructive exchanges and a more extensive and quick circulation of published works (see The Effect of Open Access).
