Explorando la Producción Científica Andaluza en Trabajo Social: Un análisis de Web of Science

Alfonso Chaves-Montero

doi:10.62161/revvisual.v16.5393

Authors

Alfonso Chaves-Montero https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5861-3414

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62161/revvisual.v16.5393

Keywords:

Social Work, Bibliometric analysis, Andalusia, Scientific journals, Publications, Web of Science, Scopus

Abstract

The scientific research on social work is gaining importance in higher education. Although the incorporation of this discipline into academic research may have been delayed, it remains equally significant. Our aim in this article is to explore and analyze the current bibliographic production in the field of social education in Andalusia, mainly using the Web of Science database. The main objective of this research is to perform a bibliometric analysis of this area of knowledge, examine the indicators related to social work, and identify the strengths and weaknesses of this specific discipline.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barenys, M. P. y Jutglar, A. (1976). Orígenes del Trabajo Social: Cataluña. Entrevista a María Estrada, asistente social. Revista de Trabajo Social, (63), 16-24.

Beddoe, L. (2011). Investing in the future: Social workers talk about research. British Journal of Social Work, 41(3), 557-575. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcq138

Callon, M., Courtial, J., Turner, W. y Bauin, S. (1983). From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-wordanalysis. Social Science Information, 22(2), 191-235. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901883022002003

Callon, M., Courtial, J. y Laville, F. (1991). Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research - The case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics, 22, 155-205. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02019280

Castillo, A. (2011). Aproximación al Trabajo Social en España. Serviço Social & Sociedade, 108, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-66282011000400003

Cobo, M. J., López‐Herrera, A. G., Herrera‐Viedma, E. & Herrera, F. (2012). SCIMAT: A new science mapping analysis software tool. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(8), 1609-1630. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22688

Costas, R. & Bordons, M. (2008). Is g-index better than h-index? An exploratory study at the individual level. Scientometrics, 77, 267-288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1997-0

Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131-152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0144-7

Estruch, J. y Güell, A. (1976). Sociología de una profesión: los asistentes sociales. Península.

Garfield, E. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science, 178(4060), 471-479. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.178.4060.471

Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the NationalAcademyofSciences, 102(46),16569-16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102

Holden, G., Rosenberg, G. y Barker, K. (2005). Bibliometrics in Social Work. Binghamton. HaworthPress.

Martínez-Sánchez, M. A., Díaz Herrera M., Lima Fernández A. I., Herrera Gómez M. y Herrera-Viedma E. (2014). Un análisis bibliométrico de la producción académica española en la categoría de Trabajo Social del Journal Citation Report. Cuadernos de Trabajo Social, 27(2), 429-438. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_CUTS.2014.v27.n2.44662

Martínez Sánchez, M.A., Rodríguez Fernández, F.L., Cobo Martín, M.J. y Herrera-Viedma, E. (2017). ¿Qué está pasando en el Área de Trabajo Social según el Web of Science? Cuadernos de Trabajo Social, 30(1), 125-134. https://doi.org/10.5209/CUTS.51495

Noyons, E., Moed, H. & Luwel, M. (1999). Combining mapping and citationanal y evaluative bibliometric purposes: A bibliometric study. Journal of the American Societ y for Information Science, 50(2), 115-131. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:2<115::AID-ASI3>3.0.CO;2-J

Osmond, J. & O’Connor, I. (2004). Formalizing the unformalized: Practitioners’ communication of knowledge in practice. British Journal of Social Work, 34(5), pp. 677-692. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bch084

Osmond, J. (2005). The knowledge spectrum: A framework for teaching knowledge and its use in social work practice. British Journal of Social Work, 35(6), 881-900.https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bch280

Trevithick, P. (2008). Revisiting the knowledge base of social work: A framework for practice. British Journal of Social Work, 38(6), 1212-1237. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcm026

Rosenberg, G., Holden, G., & Barker, K. (2005). What happens to our ideas? A bibliometric analysis of articles in Social Work in Health Care in the 1990s. Social Work in Health Care, 41(3-4), 35–66. https://doi.org/10.1300/J010v41n03_02

Sarasa, S. (1993). El servicio de lo social. Ministerio de Asuntos Sociales.

Sellers, S., Mathiesen, S., Smith, T. & Perry R. (2006). Perceptions of professional Social Work journals: Findings from a national study. Journal of Social Work Education, 42(1), pp. 139-160. https://doi.org/10.5175/JSWE.2006.200303095

Van Rann, A. (2004). MeasuringScience: Capita Selecta of Current Main Issues. En H. Moed, W. Glänzel y U. Schmoch (Coords.). Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 19-50). Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Winston LeCroy, C. (2010). Knowledge Building and Social Work Research: A Critical Perspective. Research on Social Work Practice, 20(3), 321-324. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731509331874